Web Analytics
S StakingBoard
Apps / Team Finance / Alternatives

Alternatives to Team Finance

6 comparable token locker apps to consider in place of Team Finance, ranked by value held. The largest is UNCX Network V2 — but the right pick depends on your chain and risk tolerance.

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Ranked by value held

Comparable apps to Team Finance

1.
UNCX Network V2 Token locker

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $140 M Audits: 2
2.
GoPlus Locker V3 Token locker

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $35 M
3.
UNCX Network V3 Token locker

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $26 M Audits: 2
4.
Bitbond Lockers Token locker

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $12 M Audits: 2
5.
FlokiFi Locker Token locker

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $12 M Audits: 2
6.
DaVinciGraph Token locker

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $1.9 M

Frequently asked

Switching from Team Finance — common questions

Why might I look for an alternative to Team Finance? +
Common reasons: better rates on a sister app, fewer chain dependencies, smaller smart-contract surface, or simply diversification. Concentration risk in a single protocol — no matter how well-known — is a real category of loss.
Are alternatives to Team Finance safer or riskier? +
Same category usually means similar risk shape but different code. A smaller alternative may have less audit history; a larger one may have more attack surface. Compare value held + audit count, and don't move funds to a protocol you can't quickly summarise.
Is it costly to switch from Team Finance? +
You'll pay gas to exit and re-enter, plus any spread or unbonding delay. For LP and lending positions, accumulated rewards or withdrawal queues add friction. Calculate the break-even rate gap before moving.
How do I choose the right alternative? +
Match category first, then chain (you don't want to learn a new chain just for yield), then size (bigger usually safer), then rate. The 'best' alternative is the one whose risks you understand.