Web Analytics
Apps / Stargate V2 / Alternatives

Alternatives to Stargate V2

6 comparable cross chain bridge apps to consider in place of Stargate V2, ranked by value held. The largest is Hyperlane — but the right pick depends on your chain and risk tolerance.

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Ranked by value held

Comparable apps to Stargate V2

1.
Hyperlane Cross chain bridge

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $140 M
2.
NEAR Intents Cross chain bridge

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $71 M
3.
Maya Protocol Cross chain bridge

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $13 M Audits: 2
4.
EverRise Cross chain bridge

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $1.7 M Audits: 2
5.
Butter Network Cross chain bridge

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $1.6 M
6.
Meson Cross chain bridge

On-chain app letting people earn on the tokens they hold.

Value held: $1.2 M

Frequently asked

Switching from Stargate V2 — common questions

Why might I look for an alternative to Stargate V2? +
Common reasons: better rates on a sister app, fewer chain dependencies, smaller smart-contract surface, or simply diversification. Concentration risk in a single protocol — no matter how well-known — is a real category of loss.
Are alternatives to Stargate V2 safer or riskier? +
Same category usually means similar risk shape but different code. A smaller alternative may have less audit history; a larger one may have more attack surface. Compare value held + audit count, and don't move funds to a protocol you can't quickly summarise.
Is it costly to switch from Stargate V2? +
You'll pay gas to exit and re-enter, plus any spread or unbonding delay. For LP and lending positions, accumulated rewards or withdrawal queues add friction. Calculate the break-even rate gap before moving.
How do I choose the right alternative? +
Match category first, then chain (you don't want to learn a new chain just for yield), then size (bigger usually safer), then rate. The 'best' alternative is the one whose risks you understand.